Energy
Ecosystem function relies on energy and its transfer.
In most cases, the source of the energy is usually the sun. In recent
years, however, ecosystems have been discovered in the deep sea
that derive their energy from chemicals rather than light.
In the majority of cases, light energy is captured
from the sun by autotrophic organisms (also known
as producers), and converted to sugars through a process known as
photosynthesis . The main producers in the marine
environment are seaweeds and phytoplankton
. Seaweeds are members of the algal kingdom rather than
being plants. Phytoplankton are microscopic algae. They are single
celled, but can often form chains. Seaweeds are particularly important
in coastal areas, but in the open ocean phytoplankton are the most
important. The main producers in the terrestrial environment are
vascular plants, particularly trees and grasses (see Dorset's
Coastal and Marine Habitats ). These have a much more complex
anatomy as they require adaptations to a terrestrial environment.
Adaptations include an internal transport system for water and nutrients,
strengthening tissue and an epidermis that allows photosynthesis
and respiration to occur whilst protecting the plant against excessive
water loss.
The producers grow and reproduce, providing the
food for the heterotrophic component of the system,
the consumers. Heterotrophic organisms are defined as all forms
of life that obtain their energy from the consumption of producers,
or the consumption of those organisms that have consumed producers,
or through the absorption of dissolved organic matter in the environment.
The arrangement of autotrophs and heterotrophs is called the trophic
structure , in which each layer is called a trophic
level .
As energy is transferred from one trophic level
to the next, much is lost through heat and metabolic use by the
organisms. The amount lost is variable, but substantial, with estimates
ranging from 80% to 95% of the energy in that level. The system,
thus, becomes self-limiting. This can be visualised as a trophic
or energy pyramid (Figure 1). The producers or autotrophs are at
the bottom, the second level includes the primary consumers, i.e.
the herbivores that consume the plant material.
The third level contains the secondary consumers, i.e. the carnivores
that consume the herbivores. The next level contains the
tertiary consumers, i.e. the carnivores that consume other carnivores.
This continues until there is no energy left to support another
layer. All levels above the first contain omnivores (organisms
that consume both plant and animal material). The last element of
trophic structure is the decomposers . These are
organisms (mainly bacteria) that break down the complex organic
molecules of dead organisms, and release reusable simple molecules
that can be used by autotrophs and heterotrophs. In Figure 1, the
size of each layer relates to the amount of biomass contained within
that layer.
Figure 1: Trophic pyramid

In recent years, communities have
been found in the marine environment that do not derive their energy
from the sun. These communities were probably the most exciting
and significant discovery in marine ecology since the 1970s. In
1977, near hot-water geysers on the sea floor animals were observed
in extremely abundant communities in an otherwise barren sea floor.
It has since been discovered that these hydrothermal vent
communities rely on hydrogen sulphide for their energy
requirements. Sulphur bacteria use the hydrogen sulphide in a process
known as chemosynthesis to build complex organic
molecules and grow. This process is very similar to photosynthesis
but does not require light (Figure 2). These bacteria are then eaten
by heterotrophs or live symbiotically with larger animals. Symbiosis
is defined as a mutually beneficial relationship between
two organisms. In the hydrothermal vent communities, symbiotic relationships
occur between the sulphur bacteria, which provide their host with
a food source, and many of the dominant species in the community
which provide the bacteria with protection and, through their blood,
a ready supply of hydrogen sulphide.
Figure 2: Comparison of photosynthesis and chemosynthesis.

The Physical Environment
The place where organisms are found is referred
to as their habitat . Some examples of marine habitats
include rocky shores, sandy beaches, coral reefs, estuaries, and
the open ocean. Examples of terrestrial habitats are given in Dorset's
Coastal and Marine Habitats. Habitats are characterised
by their abiotic features. Consequently, the physical and chemical
environment dictates which individuals can live there. It is an
individual's tolerance to abiotic factors such as temperature, water
movement, salinity, nutrient availability, etc., that limits where
they can survive. Each habitat can be divided into microhabitats
. For example, consider a rocky shore: this contains a
variety of microhabitats including the rock itself, rock pools,
sediment on the shore, and the underside of boulders. The seaweed
will also provide places for organisms to live and is therefore
considered to be a microhabitat. In general, the more complex the
habitat, the more microhabitats it will contain. A good example
of this is coral reefs, which have an extremely complex structure
and therefore thousands of microhabitats.
The rocky shore provides an excellent example of
how different abiotic factors influence where organisms live. The
distribution of species on the shore from the high tide to the low
tide mark is determined by factors such as length of air exposure
during low tide, ability to withstand the force of the waves, rock
type, and rapid changes in salinity and temperature. Rocky shores
are dominated by the tide, which produces a gradient of environmental
conditions. At the highest part of the shore, conditions are almost
terrestrial with wetting mainly from wave splash and only rarely
submerged. The lowest part of the shore is rarely uncovered, except
on the lowest spring tides and only for brief periods. In between,
individuals experience a range of exposure and submersion depending
on their position on the shore. This range of environmental conditions
results in species zonation because no organism
is equally well suited to all levels on the shore.
Different levels on the shore are occupied by different
assemblages of species, each individual having
its main abundance within a particular zone where conditions are
most favourable for it. Above and below this zone, numbers will
decrease or be absent as environmental conditions are less suitable.
The niche is defined broadly as
the role of an organism in its community. A niche is made up of
every environmental and biological variable affecting the species.
For any given variable, e.g. temperature, the range within which
the organism can exist and reproduce is defined as part of its niche.
The different tolerances to all the different variables combine
to form the fundamental niche . The fundamental
niche is the range of abiotic conditions which a species can theoretically
occupy, whilst the realised niche is that part
of the full range that is left to a species after biotic interactions
such as competition and predation. Ecological niches can be broad
or narrow and species at the extremes of this are defined as generalists
or specialists. Generalists can tolerate a wide
range of conditions whilst specialists have very
restricted range of tolerances.
Interactions between
species
The most important interactions occurring between
individuals are competition and predation. Both of these are biological
regulators of populations. Their importance also varies in different
communities.
Competition is defined as the
interaction between individuals for a limited resource .
Competition can be intraspecific (between individuals
of the same species) or interspecific (between
different species). In a competitive interaction, either the competitors
manage to share the resource, or one excludes the other. Where the
resource is shared, the fitness of the competitors is reduced, i.e.
their growth and reproduction are limited as energy is utilised
in the competitive interaction. Where two species are competing
for the same limited resource, the dominant competitor will out-compete
the inferior competition. This can lead to one species being excluded.
The competitive exclusion principle states that
no two species with exactly the same requirements can coexist in
the same place at the same time, i.e. species with identical niches
cannot exist together.
The amount of competition is linked to the amount
of niche overlap . The more similar the requirements
of two individuals, the more competition there will be between them.
As populations increase, so competition for resources increases.
This increased competition absorbs energy that would otherwise be
used for growth and reproduction. Consequently, populations can
be limited by competition.
Predation is defined as the consumption
of one species by another. This definition includes the traditional
carnivore, but also includes grazers (herbivores)
and seed eaters. Carnivores and herbivores vary considerably in
their ability to regulate prey populations. Sometimes, the predator
may have little effect on the prey population and its removal would
have little discernible effect on prey population numbers. In other
cases, the predator may be the most important factor regulating
prey population numbers. If the predator is removed, the prey population
can explode. Occasionally, this can have dramatic consequences for
the rest of the community. Keystone species are
predators whose removal causes great changes in the presence and
abundance of many species in the community, most of which are not
the prey of the predator.
The effects of predation and competition are
also interlinked within the ecosystem. The effect of a predator
on one species will influence its ability to compete with other
species. Predator mediated coexistence occurs
when the preferred prey of a predator has its dominant competitive
ability reduced. This normally dominant species is no longer able
to out-compete its rivals. Without the presence of the predator,
this species would normally exclude its rivals from the community.
Life in the sea varies from very simple, single
celled, microscopic organisms such as diatoms to complex, vertebrate
organisms such as fish, dolphins and whales. More simple and fragile
life forms can exist in the marine environment than in terrestrial
environments because water provides them with support, flotation,
transport and protection. Consequently, very simple reproductive
processes are enabled and the need for structural complications
such as skeletons and protective coverings is minimised. At the
other end of the scale is the Blue Whale, the largest organism ever
to have existed on the planet.
Biodiversity , or biological diversity,
simply means the ‘variety of life'. It can be viewed at many different
levels from the variety within a species (genetic), between species
(taxonomic) and of ecosystem (ecological). For example, wild Atlantic
Salmon, after several years at sea, return to breed in the very
river where they were born. The salmon from each river in the UK
are all the same species (Salmo salar) but they are genetically
different: genetic diversity . On a global basis,
there are six different species of salmon: taxonomic diversity
. The rivers all over the world to which the salmon return
are all slightly different. They each have their own assemblages
of species and communities: ecological diversity .
Some communities have extremely high species diversity,
e.g. coral reefs. There are two contrasting theories as to why this
occurs. The equilibrium theory suggests that the
species diversity of a community is usually in a state of equilibrium
and that high diversity is due to a high number of habitats and/or
niches maintained by various feedback mechanisms (niche
diversification) and the stable nature of the physical
environment. The other theory, nonequilibrium
or intermediate disturbance hypothesis, suggests that communities
and species are rarely in a state of equilibrium and high species
diversity is maintained through continual and gradual environmental
change and periodic disturbance. This promotes a changing species
composition through the presence of many species that are not highly
specialised. In this model, where communities experience little
disturbance, competitive interactions can continue, and exclusions
occur. This results in communities of low diversity. Where disturbance
is frequent, species are eliminated if they cannot attain maturity
and reproduce before the next disturbance. When disturbances are
intermediate in occurrence diversity increases. Slower-growing and
-reproducing species are given a chance to establish themselves.
However, competitive exclusions are not given a chance to occur
before the next disturbance event.
Measurement of Biodiversity
Biodiversity is measured in a wide variety of ways
depending upon the level of diversity being considered. This includes:
a -diversity is concerned
with the species diversity within a habitat or community. This is
the most common level at which biodiversity is assessed.
b -diversity corresponds
with the variation in diversity from one habitat (community) to
another. It is also concerned with the extent and rate of change
of species richness and distribution along a gradient.
g -diversity is the
species richness of a range of habitats in a geographic area
Since a -diversity is the most commonly measured
level, it is the only one that will be dealt with here. The simplest
measure of biodiversity at the species level is species
richness , i.e. the number of species present (denoted
S). This however, takes no account of the number of individuals
present belonging to each species. The relative abundance of each
species is termed evenness . In a community with
high evenness, most of the species present will have similar abundances,
i.e. no single species dominates the community. Communities can
differ in both these attributes. A highly diverse community would
have a high species richness and a high species evenness. A community
with an identical number of species but which is dominated by a
single species would generally be considered to be less diverse,
despite having the same number of species.
Of the many diversity and evenness indices, the
Shannon-Wiener Index (denoted H') and Simpson's Index (denoted D')
are the most widely used. The Shannon-Wiener Index is sensitive
to changes in the number and abundance of rare species, whilst Simpson's
Index is more sensitive to changes in the abundance of dominant
species.

The proportion of each species in the sample is
estimated ( p i ), logged and then multiplied by
themselves. The resulting values are then summed for all species
in the sample. As a check, S p i
should equal 1. The original calculation used logs to base 2, but
any base can be used. Natural logs are the most common base used
today. Shannon-Wiever Index varies from zero to a maximum equivalent
to the log of species richness ( Ln S ). See table
1 for an example calculation of data collected from Kimmeridge Bay.

Dead men's fingers.

The value of the index ranges from
0 to 1. At zero, all the individuals belong to the same species
and at one they belong to different species. See Table 1 for an
example calculation of data collected from Kimmeridge Bay.
Table 1:Calculation of Shannon-Wiener
and Simpson's diversity indices.
| Species |
S |
ni
|
p i =
n i /N |
Ln p
i |
p i Ln
p i |
pi 2 |
Nucella lapillus Dog
Whelk |
1 |
2 |
0.0589 |
-2.8319 |
-0.1668 |
0.0035 |
Patella vulgata Common
limpet |
2 |
9 |
0.2647 |
-1.3292 |
-0.3518 |
0.0701 |
Carcinus
maenas Common shore crab |
3 |
1 |
0.0294 |
-3.5268 |
-0.1037 |
0.0009 |
Mono-donta
lineata Toothed Winkle |
4 |
3 |
0.0882 |
-2.4281 |
-0.2142 |
0.0078 |
Gibbula umbil-licalis
Purple Top-Shell |
5 |
2 |
0.0589 |
-2.8319 |
-0.1668 |
0.0035 |
Gibbula cineraria
Grey Top-Shell |
6 |
4 |
0.1176 |
-2.1405 |
-0.2517 |
0.0138 |
Littorina
littorea Edible Peri-winkle |
7 |
10 |
0.2941 |
-1.2238 |
-0.3599 |
0.0865 |
Littorina
obtusata Flat Peri-winkle |
8 |
3 |
0.0882 |
-2.4281 |
-0.2142 |
0.0078 |
Totals |
|
34 |
1.000 |
|
-1.8291 |
0.1939 |
Shannon-Wiever
index |
|
|
H'= 1.8291 |
|
|
|
Simpson's Index |
D = 0.1939 |
|
D' = 0.80 |
|
|
|
Factors Affecting Biodiversity at the Local
Scale
A variety of factors can influence biodiversity
at the local scale beyond those biological interactions already
discussed. These include habitat complexity and changes to the habitat.
Habitat complexity has been shown to be very important
in the terrestrial environment with increased complexity leading
to increased diversity. Investigations on the relationship between
habitat complexity and biodiversity in the marine environment have
only begun relatively recently. One example of this is the influence
of piddocks on intertidal biodiversity on soft rock shores, including
Lyme Regis (Pinn et al ., 2002).
The relative softness of chalk and clay, and their
friable nature, is favourable to the creation of a variety of microhabitats.
Erosion, either physically or biologically generated, creates crevices,
clefts and ledges, which provide a variety of microhabitats suitable
for different forms of life. Piddocks are one of the most characteristic
faunal groups inhabiting soft rock shores. These bivalve molluscs
are similar in dimensions to the edible mussel. Unlike most molluscs,
however, piddocks live in a burrow, which they bore in the surface
of soft rocks. Piddocks tended to aggregate together in patches
ranging from around 20 square metres to over 1500 square metres.
Where abundant, their borings can severely compromise the structural
stability of the substratum, resulting in increased rates of erosion.
Piddock burrows are approximately conical in shape,
with the opening being narrower than the base of the burrow. The
shape of the burrow, however, was found to be modified by population
density. In areas of high population density, the burrows become
either J shaped or very convoluted. At Lyme Regis, 50% or more of
the burrows present were found to be no longer occupied by piddocks.
These empty burrows added considerably to the small-scale complexity
of the shore profile and provided refuge, from predation or desiccation
stress, for other marine organisms.
At Lyme Regis, a comparison was made of the species
richness in three microhabitat types: open rock, Piddock burrows,
and piddock-like. The presence of Piddocks significantly increases
the number of species observed (Figure 3). Hence the burrowing activity
of piddocks enhanced local biodiversity with, on average, about
twice as many species living on areas of rock with burrows than
on adjacent areas of rock without burrows.

Figure 3: Comparison of the species
richness in three microhabitat types at Lyme Regis.
The species found living in old Piddock
burrows included sponges (e.g. Breadcrumb Sponge Halichondria
panicea), periwinkles ( Littorina littorea ), Dog
Whelks (Nucella lapillus ), crustaceans (e.g. the broad
clawed Porcelian Crab Porcellana platycheles and the Hairy
Crab Pilumnus hirtellus ) and polychaetes (e.g. Peacock
Worm Sabella pavonina and the Greenleaf Worm Eulalia
viridis ). In addition, a comparison of the occupants of three
different size groups of old Piddock burrows (2-6mm, 8-12mm and
>14mm burrow opening) was made. Burrow occupancy by non-Piddock
species ranged from 0-10% in small burrows, 10-45% in medium sized
burrows and 5-30% in large burrows. Small burrows regularly had
the lowest diversity of occupants and medium sized burrows the greatest.
The additional habitat complexity and associated
species diversity generated by the burrowing activity of Piddocks
is relevant to assessing and understanding the factors regulating
biodiversity along these soft rock shores. Soft rock shores such
as chalk are rare in Europe and areas of soft rock along the south
coast of England are of particular conservation interest. The Dorset
coastline contains some of the best examples of soft rock shores
in the UK, comprising a significant proportion of the UNESCO World
Heritage Site.
At the other end of the scale, biodiversity can
be reduced by factors such as habitat destruction, fragmentation
and degradation. Habitat destruction, such as
filling and drainage of salt marshes and human-induced erosion,
is one of the major sources of biodiversity loss or reduction because
it removes the habitats upon which species depend. Habitat
fragmentation , where previously continuous habitats are
broken into smaller isolated parcels, is also an important loss
of biodiversity. As large tracts of habitat are broken up, foragers
and predators no longer have a continuous range of habitat over
which to feed. In addition, planktonic colonisation becomes more
difficult. A fragment may still contain a species, but not enough
individuals to maintain the population in the long term. However,
fragments have longer edges, which may create new habitats for some
species. Habitat degradation is probably the most
important potential source of biodiversity loss. For example, nutrient
increases can lead to phytoplankton population increases which lead
to loss of light to the seabed. This can have dramatic negative
consequences for sea grass beds and the species that rely on them.
Degraded habitats are typically species-poor environments.
Why is Biodiversity Important?
There are many ethical and moral reasons why biodiversity
should be maintained. Everyone would agree that a marine world comprised
only of two species, a seaweed and a worm, would be very boring.
There are, however, some very practical reasons why the maintenance
of biodiversity is so important.
Due to the interlinked nature of communities and
the fact that many species play crucial roles within their community
(e.g. recycling nutrients, or regulating prey populations), maintenance
of diversity is vital if ecosystem function is to be retained. If
a particular species were lost from the ecosystem, its role may
be so important that the ecosystem collapses as it can no longer
function properly.
Genetic diversity within a species will increase
its ability to exist long term. For example, a single genetically
identical population could be wiped out by disease, however, elsewhere
this species may continue to exist if its genetic variability gives
it some resistance to the disease. So, although a population is
lost, the species is not. If every individual within the species
was genetically identical, then the disease could spread throughout
the entire species and make it extinct. So why is this important
to us? One obvious example is food production through fishing and
fish farming.
Marine biodiversity may also be a very important
source of drugs and medicines for man. In recent years, some very
important discoveries have been made. Chemicals obtained from sponges
have been found to have antitumor properties, and a steroid from
the Dogfish Shark ( Squalus acanthias ) helps on the treatment
of fungal infections dangerous to AIDS and cancer patients. More
than 1700 compounds with biomedical properties have been reported
from marine sources in the last 10 years.
UK Biodiversity Action Plan
The ‘Convention on Biological Diversity' was one
of the outcomes of the Earth Summit held in Rio in 1992. Signatories
to the Convention were obliged to develop national strategies for
the protection and sustainable use of biodiversity. The UK was a
signatory and as such developed the UK Biodiversity Action Plan
which was published in 1994 (www.JNCC.gov.uk
). The plan combined new and existing conservation initiatives
with an emphasis on a partnership approach (www.ukbap.org.uk
). A steering group was set up to process four main areas identified
in the plan:
key species and habitats
access to biodiversity databases
public awareness and involvement
monitoring systems
Priority species and habitats have been identified,
for which action plans have been developed (www.english-nature.org.uk
). Species Action Plans (SAPs) provide information on the threats
facing the species and opportunities for maintaining and enhancing
their populations. Species Statements may also be produced which
provide an overview of the status of the species and set out policies
that can be developed to conserve them. Examples of Species Action
Plans included the native oyster and the Pink Seafan. Priority Habitats
Action Plans (HAPs) set out detailed actions to safeguard and enhance
these habitats. Examples of Habitat Action Plans include saline
lagoons, littoral and sub-littoral chalk, coastal shingle and lowland
and upland heathlands. Following the development of the national
biodiversity plans, local biodiversity plans have also been developed
which identify local priorities and determine the contribution to
the national Species and Habitat Action Plan targets. One example
of a local action plan is the Dorset Biodiversity Strategy
, which was launched in May 2003.
The Dorset Biodiversity Strategy aims to:
‘ensure that national targets for species
and habitats, as specified in the UK BAP, are translated into effective
action at the local level
identify targets for species and habitats
appropriate to the local area, and reflecting the values of people
locally
develop effective local partnerships
to ensure that programmes for biodiversity conservation are maintained
in the long term
raise awareness of the need for biodiversity
conservation in the local context
ensure that opportunities for conservation
and enhancement of the whole biodiversity resource are fully considered
provide a basis for monitoring progress
in biodiversity conservation, at both local and national level'
Marine and coastal priority species identified within
the Dorset Biodiversity Strategy (www.wildlifetrust.org.uk/dorset/)
include the Little Tern (Sterna albifrons), Pink Seafan
(Eunicella verrucosa), Lulworth Skipper (Thymelicus
aceteon), Scaly Cricket (Mogoplistes squamiger) and
the Harbour Porpoise. Priority coastal and marine habitats include
coastal vegetated shingle and coastal sand dunes, coastal salt marsh,
littoral and sublittoral chalk, Maerl beds (Phymatolithon calcareum
and Lithothamnion coralloides), saline lagoons and
seagrass beds (Zostera marina).
|